deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
more ▶

Featured in Groups:

Details

February 12, 2010
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 69
Favourites: 0
Views: 173 (0 today)
[x]

brave new medium

Fri Feb 12, 2010, 4:06 PM


I think there's a lot of residual opposition to digital art in my school, which can sometimes be a little aggravating. It's tiresome to constantly have to defend what you do when others don't have to do the same. But I think at the same time, it's good to have your beliefs challenged, and it's good to be pushed really far out of your comfort zone. Being pressured into producing work in a way I'm less than comfortable with is widening my range and making me think about digital art in a different way, too.

I've had a number of teachers who are outright disdainful of digital art and pressured me to work traditionally. From those experiences I formed a new way of working and began to see the benefit of traditional elements in my own digital art. My use of textures came almost exclusively from experiences like that and I think they've made my art more complete. I wasn't at all accomplished at digital painting until I took a traditional painting course. There are different mechanics, but the principles are about the same.

Essentially, I used to be a purist and an apologist, and now I'm neither. I don't need to apologize for preferring digital art, because I have real, personal reasons for doing so. I'm no longer a purist because I recognize that there are elements to traditional art that are worthy of being emulated in the digital medium.

Too much wailing goes on from the digital art camp about how we should be treated equally and how it's so unfair that we're persecuted in favor of traditional artists. I took part in it! But I have come to the conclusion that every new "thing" goes through this period of transition. It's like a butterfly escaping from its cocoon; rather than quashing the digital art movement, the opposition to it will make it stronger and more creative.

I guess what I mean is that it really benefited me to come to this realization...recognizing that digital art can fight its own battles, and that I didn't have to act like a spokesperson for the medium, was truly uplifting.

By the way, if you want my advice, don't bother arguing with anyone who states that a specific medium "isn't art". They're beyond hope. Arguing with them is only going to make them talk more, and in the end they and those of their ilk will die out, along with all the people who decried impressionism and postmodern sculpture and so on.

  • Mood: Neutral
Add a Comment:
 
:iconthundercake:
`thundercake Feb 13, 2010  Professional Digital Artist
has he heard of an eraser? =p
Reply
:iconphridoleenus:
~phridoleenus Feb 14, 2010  Student Digital Artist
that's what i thought!

.. two days after.
Reply
:iconblastedgoose:
~blastedgoose Feb 13, 2010  Hobbyist Digital Artist
That is like saying photography is cheating because the colors are provided for you! Forget about what that person said--it comes from ignorance and a lack of understanding.
Reply
:iconphridoleenus:
~phridoleenus Feb 14, 2010  Student Digital Artist
yeah! thank you c:
Reply
:iconmarchetooo:
~marchetooo Feb 12, 2010  Student Traditional Artist
Traditional media is important and I`m glad you realize it. You can always have a benefit from everything different. :)
Reply
:iconrillani:
~rillani Feb 12, 2010  Professional Digital Artist
Digital illustrations might not make it into some expensive gallery just yet, but when your art gets on a Magic card and is seen by hundreds of thousands of kids, perhaps inspiring some of them to become artists themselves... what does it matter? You'll have touched hearts and minds. That's the important part.
Reply
:iconshedano:
~shedano Feb 12, 2010  Student Filmographer
As another point, if they really think digital art is going nowhere...they should really take a look at Pixar and Dreamworks. Those films are 3d computer models done in a program called Maya. Not easy. Not fun (especially since it crashes a lot). Avatar was done by all animators (not James Cameron) using Maya. That film sure went somewhere with a digital 3d art program. Made more money than they did, that's for sure.
Reply
:iconlife-take:
I think it's dumb to confine art to seperate media; all media have something to teach other media! An oil painter wouldn't deride someone for preferring charcoal now would they...?
Reply
:iconshedano:
~shedano Feb 12, 2010  Student Filmographer
It's not that traditional is any better than digital or digital any better than traditional, the problem is that the fundamentals of painting and texturing are really thoroughly taught and learned at the traditional art. Because someone who has done traditional art and really experienced with it can make kick ass digital art barely knowing the program, but quite a few digital artists can know what every button does, but their work is still a flop. They really don't understand what goes into that fundamental stage of coloring, lining, or texturing (well most of them). I think traditional art should be a basic requirement to digital art, because it's the basics of learning. It doesn't mean you're better...you just need the basics to understand the more complex medium and push it to its limit to make phenomenal work.
Reply
:iconthundercake:
`thundercake Feb 13, 2010  Professional Digital Artist
I have to disagree that a good artist can create great digital art without knowing the program. The fundamentals might be there, but it would be very obvious that they were new to the program. Beginners tend to make the same mistakes, mainly based on their common lack of a frame of reference; it takes a lot of practice to learn how to manipulate the tools.

I think it's theoretically possible to learn straight digital without ever painting in traditional media, but there aren't enough good teachers and the medium is still too young. In time I have no doubt that such a thing would be doable (and done).
Reply
Add a Comment: